WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:02.403 When I was a kid I realised... 2 00:00:02.649 --> 00:00:06.266 that elegance and beauty are actually transverse, 3 00:00:06.407 --> 00:00:09.075 they cross time. 4 00:00:09.342 --> 00:00:12.200 I started in the late 70s, 5 00:00:12.449 --> 00:00:15.407 the phenomenon of Italian fashion did not exist yet. 6 00:00:15.662 --> 00:00:17.848 An incredible thing happened. 7 00:00:18.046 --> 00:00:20.102 I rose through the ranks, 8 00:00:20.326 --> 00:00:23.791 for 7 years I did weddings, religious ceremonies, duplicates... 9 00:00:23.991 --> 00:00:27.404 anything really, but that is how I learned. 10 00:00:27.617 --> 00:00:29.971 When I felt ready, 11 00:00:30.197 --> 00:00:32.961 the "Made in Italy" burst, in Milan, my home, 12 00:00:33.143 --> 00:00:37.392 together with Italian fashion, a very unexpected phenomenon. 13 00:00:37.628 --> 00:00:41.243 My choice of rethinking an elegant world, 14 00:00:41.490 --> 00:00:44.597 placed me out of time. 15 00:00:45.006 --> 00:00:48.834 At the beginning it was not on purpose, 16 00:00:49.071 --> 00:00:54.297 but it made my pictures resistant to time, more than others. 17 00:00:55.161 --> 00:00:57.782 They are not linked to a specific moment. 18 00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:01.133 I think there exist only two families of photographers, 19 00:01:01.393 --> 00:01:05.424 those who have a reporter soul, 20 00:01:06.303 --> 00:01:11.304 they are extremely skilful in synthetizing an event 21 00:01:12.969 --> 00:01:16.260 that occurs in the real world. 22 00:01:16.494 --> 00:01:20.305 The others are descended from painting, 23 00:01:20.600 --> 00:01:23.374 like myself, 24 00:01:23.635 --> 00:01:27.789 they believe this profession is the pantomime of the world, 25 00:01:28.052 --> 00:01:30.964 the mise-en-scène of the world. 26 00:01:31.237 --> 00:01:33.851 I do not speak about reality, 27 00:01:34.085 --> 00:01:37.106 somehow I am not even interested in reality, 28 00:01:37.313 --> 00:01:40.290 I am interested in rethinking a parallel reality, 29 00:01:40.529 --> 00:01:43.237 which is, as I said, the mise-en-scène of reality. 30 00:01:43.471 --> 00:01:46.315 We are not neutral, nobody is really neutral, 31 00:01:46.536 --> 00:01:49.465 even war photography is a mise-en-scène of the war, 32 00:01:49.688 --> 00:01:52.638 it is not the real war. it is a still frame of the war, 33 00:01:52.847 --> 00:01:55.466 in which you took choices that are emotional, 34 00:01:55.686 --> 00:01:58.234 that's what an author has to do. 35 00:01:58.435 --> 00:02:01.359 They must see you, filter you, sense you, 36 00:02:01.579 --> 00:02:04.316 and take a picture of you as they see you. 37 00:02:04.532 --> 00:02:07.365 This is a very personal thought, 38 00:02:07.613 --> 00:02:12.741 but I think digital photography is the birth of photography. 39 00:02:14.434 --> 00:02:18.755 Anything that was done before is photographic archaeology. 40 00:02:18.999 --> 00:02:22.770 The entry of electronics in photography... 41 00:02:23.018 --> 00:02:27.447 expanded and strengthened photographic abilities. 42 00:02:31.132 --> 00:02:36.157 Photography has become a language, with mobile phones for example, 43 00:02:37.439 --> 00:02:41.412 the entire humanity has a camera in their pockets, 44 00:02:41.685 --> 00:02:45.879 it is not a question of means, but rather of personal genius, 45 00:02:46.124 --> 00:02:50.077 no technical means can restrain it. 46 00:02:50.402 --> 00:02:54.214 It is not correct to say it is easier to take pictures, 47 00:02:54.472 --> 00:02:58.857 the difference is that we used to take a lot of choices beforehand, 48 00:02:59.081 --> 00:03:03.014 sensitivity of the film, filter, grain, etc. 49 00:03:03.225 --> 00:03:06.234 Then you took the picture and submitted it. 50 00:03:06.435 --> 00:03:09.469 Now it is much more difficult, you need to have the photo, 51 00:03:09.694 --> 00:03:12.114 and do the post-production, 52 00:03:12.327 --> 00:03:15.969 you have to take afterwards the choices you took beforehand. 53 00:03:16.191 --> 00:03:19.757 The "how" does not matter, I am only interested in the "what". 54 00:03:20.024 --> 00:03:24.336 Let's consider selfies, an interesting example. 55 00:03:24.848 --> 00:03:29.925 We started from the portraits of the great Renaissance tradition, 56 00:03:31.838 --> 00:03:35.179 and we got to selfies. Are they self-portraits? 57 00:03:35.399 --> 00:03:37.832 Of course they are, 58 00:03:38.040 --> 00:03:41.420 just because they were taken with a phone they have no dignity? 59 00:03:41.643 --> 00:03:45.653 What matters is only the result. How important is how you took it? 60 00:03:45.900 --> 00:03:48.744 We should be happy that the world is taking pictures, 61 00:03:48.951 --> 00:03:52.628 it is nice that everybody owns a camera, it's the beginning.